The high court disposed of a writ petition by reason of the petitioner's want of prosecution, though the court left open the liberty to file a writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No.792 of 2017
....
Shamsun Besra
.… Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. M.K.Laik, Sr. Adv. For the Respondent-State : AC to GA-IV
08/02.01.2023 It has been submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that he
has no instruction from his client.
Considering the above facts, the present writ petition stands disposed of for want of prosecution.
However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law including the writ petition.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Shahid/
Shamsun Besra
The State of Jharkhand
Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj
Additional Collector, Sahebganj
Sub-Divisional Officer, Rajmahal
Harimohan Yadav
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
