The learned judge recorded the petitioner's submission that the writ petition has become infructuous, with no objection from the respondents, and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S). No. 5999 of 2013
Ram Nandan Prasad Sinha
………… Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK
For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Resp. : Mr. Rahul Saboo, GP-II Mr. Abhilash Kumar, AC to GP-II
Learned counsel for the respondents does not object to the
same.
In view of fair submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
kunal
Ram Nandan Prasad Sinha
The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Industries Department, Ranchi
Dr. S.N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
