Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition W.P.(C). No.3678 of 2018 due to flg. ingress of time with respondent's concurrence; prayer granted and petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission granted for withdrawal of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
(Civil Writ Jurisdiction)
W.P.(C). No.3678 of 2018
Triloki Singh
…. …. Petitioner
Versus
1. The Steel Authority of India Limited, Bokaro Steel Plant, Administrative Building, Bokaro through its Managing Director.
2. General Secretary, Krantikari Ispat Mazdoor Sangh (Hind Mazdoor Sabha), Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro …. …. Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kr. Mahtha, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Saket Upadhyay, Adv.
05/Dated: 04th January, 2023
1. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present writ petition has become infructuous by a flux of time and prayer has been made for withdrawal of the same.
2. Learned counsel for the Respondents has no objection.
3. Permission is granted.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Amar/-
Triloki Singh
The Steel Authority of India Limited, Bokaro Steel Plant
General Secretary, Krantikari Ispat Mazdoor Sangh (Hind Mazdoor Sabha), Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
