A writ petition filed for quashing a revision order dismissing the petitioner's application is dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear in court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 3578 of 2010
Bal Krishna Agarwal son of Ram Awtar Saw, resident of village Ghutwa NTS, P.O. Barkakana, P.S. Patratu, District Ramgarh
Versus
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs: “for issuance of appropriate writ(s), direction(s) and/or order(s) for quashing the order dated 26.4.2010 passed by the Mines Commissioner, Jharkhand, Ranchi (respondent No.2) in Revision Case No. 30/2010 along with Revision Case No. 47/2010 in terms of which the concerned respondent was pleased to allow the revision application of the respondent no. 5 Binod Munda by dismissing the revision application of the petitioner is completely illegal, arbitrary and against the law.”
3. This writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is closed.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Pankaj
Bal Krishna Agarwal
The State of Jharkhand
The Mines Commissioner
The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh
The District Mining Officer, Ramgarh
Binod Munda
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
