This is an oral order where the High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a writ petition for default due to non-prosecution, as the petitioner failed to appear for two consecutive hearings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 2912 of 2012
Dinesh Kumar Mahto
… …. Petitioner
… …. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
----For the Petitioner : None For Respondent no. 4 : Mr. Saket Upadhyay, Advocate ----- Oral Order
07 / Dated : 21.12.2023
None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
From perusal of the earlier order, it appears that since last two dates none is
appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
Under the circumstance, this writ petition is dismissed for default on account of
non-prosecution.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.)
AKT/Satendra
Uploaded
Dinesh Kumar Mahto
The State of Jharkhand
The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro
The District Land Acquisition Officer, Bokaro
Managing Director, Bokaro Steel Plant, Bokaro
Director, Directorate, Project and Rehabilitation, Bokaro
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
