Petitions filed by teacher associations against Jharkhand education authorities were disposed with liberty to approach concerned authorities upon State counsel's objection.
Present writ petitions stand disposed with liberty to approach concerned authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 2538 of 2019
| 1. Ranchhor Prasad Singh |
|
|---|---|
| 2. Arun Kumar Yadav Versus |
–Petitioners |
| 1. The State of Jharkhand | |
| 2. The Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi |
|
| 3. The Director, Secondary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi |
|
| 4. The District Education Officer, Jamtara | |
| 5. The Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi With W.P.(C) No. 2588 of 2019 |
--Respondents |
1. Jharkhand Intermediate Teaching and Non-Teaching |
|
| Association, Giridih through its Secretary, Nirmal Kumar | Shahi |
| 2. Undivided State Secondary Teachers Association, Giridih | , |
| through its Secretary, Arjun Prasad Versus |
–Petitioners |
| 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi |
|
| 2. The Department Grant Committee, through its Secretary, Ranchi |
|
3. The Director, Secondary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi |
|
4. The District Education Officer, Giridih |
|
| 5. The Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi With W.P.(C) No. 2590 of 2019 |
--Respondents |
Jharkhand Intermediate Teaching and Non-Teaching |
|
Association, Gumla, through its President, Naresh Kumar Versus |
–Petitioner |
| 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, | |
| School Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi | |
| 2. The Department Grant Committee, through its Secretary, Ranchi |
|
3. The Director, Secondary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi |
|
| 4. The District Education Officer, Gumla | |
| 5. The Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi With |
--Respondents |
| W.P.(C) No. 2591 of 2019 | |
| 1. Jharkhand Intermediate Teaching and Non-Teaching | |
| Association, Khunti through its Secretary, Manorma Kujur | |
2. Undivided State Secondary Teachers Association,Khunti |
|
Through its President , Pashupati Mahto Versus |
–Petitioners |
| 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi |
|
| 2. The Department Grant Committee, through its Secretary Ranchi |
|
| , 3. The Director, Secondary Education, School Education and Literacy Department, Ranchi |
|
4. The District Education Officer, Khunti |
|
| 5. The Jharkhand Academic Council, Ranchi | --Respondents |
With
W.P.(C) No. 2592 of 2019
Jharkhand State Intermediate Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff Association, Godda through its President, Sunil Kumar Mishra And Secretary, Malay Kanti Das –Petitioner
With
W.P.(C) No. 2593 of 2019
Undivided State Secondary Teachers Association, Sahibganj & Pakur, through its President, Kanai Lal Sarkar and Secretary, Dilip Kumar Ghosh –Petitioner
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
-- For the Petitioner : Mr. Durga C. Mishra, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Manish Mishra, G.P-V Mr. Raunak Sahay, A.C to G.P.-V [in W.P ( C) No. 2592 of 2019] For the Resp.-State : Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Sr.S.C.-I Ms. Priyanka Boby, A.C to Sr.S.C.-I [in W.P(C) Nos. 2538/2019, 2591/2019] For the Resp.-State : Mr. Shubham Mishra, A.C to S.C(Mines)-II [W.P ( C) No. 2590 of 2019] For the Resp.-State : Mr. Vineet Prakash, A.C to S.C.-IV For the Resp.-State : Ms. Piyushita Meha Tudu, A.C to A.A.G-IV For the Resp.-JAC : M/s. Richa Sanchita, Pinky Shaw [in all cases] For the Jharkhand Intermediate Teaching and Non-Teaching : M/s. Ashutosh Anand, A.A.G-III Mr. Ashish Kumar Thakuar, A.C to A.A.G-III [W.P( C) No. 2588 of 2019]
14/23.01.2023 In view of the subsequent development and the stand taken by the State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the present writ petitions with a liberty to approach the concerned authority.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection.
In view of the above limited prayer, the present writ petitions stand disposed of giving aforesaid liberty.
(Rajesh Kumar, J)
jk/
Ranchhor Prasad Singh and others
The State of Jharkhand and others
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
