High Court of Jharkhand dismissed this writ petition as non-prosecuted because the petitioner failed to appear in court despite repeated summons, notwithstanding the presence of respondent counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 145 of 2014 Narayan Mahto …. …. Petitioner
…. … Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N. PATHAK
-----For the Petitioner : None For the Respondent-State : Mr. Rahul Kamlesh, Advocate
prosecution.
(Dr. S. N. Pathak, J.)
RC
Narayan Mahto
The State of Jharkhand
The Director, Agriculture & Sugarcane Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi
The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi
The Deputy Commissioner, Palamau at Daltonganj
Anil Kumar Patel
S.N. PATHAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
