The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a writ petition challenging a notice for land encroachment. The court held that the alternative remedy under Section 11 of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 was available and thus did not quash the notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 1402 of 2010
1.Md. Kalamullah Hussain
2.Ainul Hoda …… Petitioners Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Others
…… Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ayush Aditya, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prashant Kr. Rai, Advocate
05/Dated: 06/10/2023
This petition has been filed for quashing the notice dated 22.02.2010 issued under Section 6 of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 by the Circle Officer, Gola.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Pending I.A, if any, stands disposed of. Interim order is vacated.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Satyarthi/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the notice dated 22.02.2010 issued under Section 6 of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 should be quashed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Md. Kalamullah Hussain
Ainul Hoda
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court