Sumitra Barman v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. The State had no objection. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. The State had no objection. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(Cr.) No. 300 of 2023
Sumitra Barman ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Devesh Krishna, S.C.(M)-III.
06/ 05.10.2023 After some arguments, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
has got no objection.
Amitesh/-
Sumitra Barman
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court