The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed the petition with a direction to approach the competent authority for nuisance removal.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition allowed; petition dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 1163 of 2023
Laxman Chandra Mandal … Petitioner
Versus
… Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaustav Roy, Advocate For the Res.-State : Mr. Jai Prakash, AAG-IA
: Ms. Omiya Anusha, A.C. to AAG-IA
04/03.08.2023
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition so as to move before the competent authority seeking direction for removal of nuisance.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Petitioner, if so advised, may move before the competent authority.
(Ambuj Nath, J.)
Jay/-
Laxman Chandra Mandal
The State of Jharkhand
The Circle Officer, Govindpur
Manjua Devi
Kalawati Devi
Ambuj Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
