Court allowed the appellant's application to withdraw the Second Appeal, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn, and the interlocutory application as disposed of being infructuous.
Prayer to withdraw the Second Appeal allowed. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Interlocutory application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI SA No. 671 of 2016
Ignasiya Toppo & Ors. ...… Appellants
Versus
Mahadeo Oraon & Ors. ......… Respondents
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Appellants : Mr. Shashank Shekhar , Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla , Adv.
09 / 06.07.2023 I.A. No. 5110 of 2023
Heard the parties.
Perusal of the record reveals that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer to withdraw this Second Appeal and this interlocutory application is supported by the affidavit of the appellant no. 4.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and consequently this interlocutory application stands disposed of being infructuous.
( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
Ignasiya Toppo
Mahadeo Oraon
Anil Kumar Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
