respect of the land in question inasmuch as they have failed in the suit filed to evict Qurban Kureshi in respect of the land in question. Even, it was also found that the Deputy Commissioner, after due verification, also found that the respondents are legal heirs of original lessee, are in possession over the land in question. Learned Single Judge also found that the appellants before us, without there being any material, only on the basis of some document prepared by them in league with some public servants like Khas Mahal Officials have made their claim, which has been deprecated. 7. The fact, which born out from the impugned order and the pleadings is that the appellants herein, who according to them, were tenant of the original lessee, now wants to grab the land and are trying to get the lease in their favour only on the ground that they are in possession over the land. The fact that they are not in possession over the land was established by the report of the Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, after due verification. Further, there is no document to suggest that they have any right over the property nor they can derive any leasehold right over the property, so that the land can be mutated in their favour. So far as cancellation of lease of the original lessee is concerned, we also find that the learned Single Judge has correctly held that the said cancellation is bad. We also find that there are no materials to cancel the lease. Further, the renewal application was still pending and was not even considered by the State respondents. Even for the sake of argument, if it is held that any tenancy was created, the same cannot be construed to be changing the nature of the land and converting its nature to commercial, which can attract violation of any terms of the lease. Thus, the learned Single Judge has correctly allowed W.P.(C) No.7336 of 2011 filed by the original writ petitioner and dismissed the writ petition filed by these appellants being W.P.(C) No.2919 of 2011. We find no merit in both these appeals. Both these appeals are, accordingly, dismissed. 8. There shall be no orders as to costs. Urgent certified copies of this order shall be issued as per the Rules.
