The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed First Appeal No. 389 of 2018 as withdrawn. The appellant was permitted to withdraw the appeal to pursue a remedy for enhancement of maintenance under Section 127 Cr.P.C., to which the respondent had no objection.
Permission was accorded to withdraw the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
First Appeal No. 389 of 2018
------
Priti Kumari @ Usha Devi. --- Appellant
Versus
Chandrajeet Prajapati. --- Respondent
Coram: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -------- For the Appellant : Mr. Ajay Kumar Trivedi, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate
18/12.5.2023 Mr. Ajay Kumar Trivedi, learned counsel for the appellant, seeks permission to withdraw this appeal in order to pursue his remedy for enhancement of the maintenance amount in terms of Section 127 Cr.P.C. Mr. Rahul Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent,
does not have any objection.
Permission is accorded.
This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay,J)
(Deepak Roshan, J)
Rakesh/-
Priti Kumari @ Usha Devi
Chandrajeet Prajapati
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
