Md Rustam Alam v. Gulnaz Parvin
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Jharkhand modified a previous order in a First Appeal, directing the Registrar General to release a deposited demand draft of Rs. 4,00,000/- to the respondent after a joint compromise was entered into between the parties.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the Registrar General to release the deposited demand draft of Rs. 4,00,000/- to the respondent.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
First Appeal No. 156 of 2016
------
Md. Rustam Alam, S/o Md. Shahzad, R/o Baddiha, Mirzaganj, P.O. Mirzaganj, P.S. Jamua, District-Giridih. --- Appellant
Versus
Gulnaz Parvin, D/o Md. Islam, residing at village-Amwatika, P.S. and P.O. Latehar, District-Latehar. --- Respondent
Coram: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
-------- For the Appellant : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Prashant Kumar Rahul, Advocate
25/2.8.2023 A modification has been sought for by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent for permission to withdraw the amount of Rs. 4,00,000/-which has been deposited by way of demand draft before the Registrar General of this Court.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Md. Rustam Alam
- respondent
Gulnaz Parvin
Coram
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- FA/156/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court