convicted the appellant. It is submitted that P.W-1 to P.W-8 have fully supported the allegation against the appellant. It is submitted that P.W-9 is the informant of this case and who has fully supported his case and has stated during his evidence that the appellant has assaulted him on his head by ‘Farsa’ and due to which he sustained injury. It is submitted that P.W-10 is the Doctor of this case who has also found injury on the person of the informant on his forehead and near the eye. It is submitted that P.W-11 is the I.O who has also supported and corroborated the evidence and as such no illegality has been committed by the learned Court below by convicting the appellant under section 307 IPC, however the learned Court below has taken lenient view by directing him to undergo R.I for a period of three years and to pay the fine of Rs.2000. Thus, this Criminal Appeal may be dismissed. 6. Perused the Lower Court Records and considered the submissions of the learned counsel for both the sides. 7. It transpires that the informant had lodged the FIR against the appellant-Sahadev Rai and his brother Vishnudeo Rai on 20.01.2002. It has been alleged that the appellant-Sahadev Rai has assaulted the informant by Garasa due to which he sustained injury on his forehead and near the nose. 8. It transpires that the police had submitted charge sheet against the appellant Sahadev Rai and his brother Bisheshwar Rai under sections 341/323/307/504/34 of the I.P.C on 08.03.2002 before the learned C.J.M, Dumka and the learned CJM, Dumka had taken cognizance against them under Sections 341/323/307/504/34 of the I.P.C.
