The High Court Bench dismissed the revision petition challenging a Family Court order granting maintenance under Section 125 Cr.PC. The Court upheld the lower court's finding that the petitioner had legally married the opposite party.
Revision application dismissed; order dated 18.08.2009 affirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 1008 of 2009
Suresh Paswan @ Suresh Ram ----Petitioner Versus Nagina Devi ----Opp. Party --CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath ---
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sheo Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State: Mr. Faruque Ansari, Advocate
04 / 08.08.2023 Petitioner Suresh Paswan @ Suresh Ram has challenged the legality, correctness and propriety of the order dated 18.08.2009, passed by Shri Vijay Narayan Singh, Principal Judge, Family Court, Palamau at Daltonganj in Misc. Case No. 14/2004, whereby and wherein, the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Palamau at Daltonganj allowed the application filed by the opposite party Nagina Devi under section 125 Cr. P.C and directed the petitioner to pay maintenance @ Rs. 1,000/- per month to her.
Ranjeet/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the learned Family Court correctly found that the opposite party was the legally wedded wife of the petitioner despite conflicting witness testimony.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suresh Paswan @ Suresh Ram
Nagina Devi
Ambuj Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
