The court dismissed a criminal revision application as abated. An affidavit clarified that the petitioner had died in 2019, leading the bench to conclude the proceedings.
The criminal revision application was dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 651 of 2010
Panchu Yadav ..… Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioner : Mr. Purnendu Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Tapas Kumar Roy, A.P.P.
04/12.01.2023 Pursuant to the issuance of notice an affidavit has been filed on behalf of the learned A.P.P. indicating therein that the petitioner had died on 28.08.2019.
2. In view of the aforesaid fact, the instant application is dismissed abated.
3. Let a copy of the order be sent to the postal address of the petitioner.
4. Let the lower court record be sent to the court concerned forthwith.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
sm/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision application should be dismissed in light of the petitioner's death.
Panchu Yadav
The State of Jharkhand
Sulekha Devi
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
