The petitioner sought direction regarding a pending petition from 2008. The Court dismissed the petition, stating it was the lawyer's duty to press the matter and declining to comment on the delay without evidence of court fault.
Petitioner at liberty to press pending petition; no direction issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 78 of 2020
Lalu Pal
…… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …… Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Kanti Kr. Ojha, Advocate
Mr. Sahja Nand Sarswati, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Mohammad Asghar, A.C. to Sr. S.C.-II
05/Dated: 03/05/2023
This petition has been filed for direction upon the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-IV, Godda to pass a reasoned order on the application filed by the petitioner, pending in the Court of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-IV, Godda.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Satyarthi/
Lalu Pal
The State of Jharkhand
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court