Matilda Ekka v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The Cr. M. P. was dismissed as infructuous since the charge had already been framed on 28.07.2022 based on the status report. No substantive legal questions were posed.
The Cr. M. P. was dismissed as infructuous since the charge had already been framed on 28.07.2022 based on the status report. No substantive legal questions were posed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M. P. No. 629 of 2018
… …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… …. Opp. Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
----For the Petitioner : Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P.
Oral Order
05 / Dated : 09.11.2023
In view of the status report, charge has been framed in the present case on
28.07.2022.
Under the circumstance, the instant cr. misc. petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J . )
AKT/Satayendra
Uploaded
Matilda Ekka
Rajbal Baraik
Paras Muni Devi
Sudhir Bhagat
The State of Jharkhand
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court