The High Court held that three criminal revision petitions became infructuous as the underlying prosecution cases regarding S.T. No. 395 of 2017 had been disposed of with acquittal of all 22 accused persons, and thus dismissed the petitions.
The petitions were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 1142 of 2018
….
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …… Opp. Party
with
Cr. M. P. No. 3125 of 2017
….
Eklavya Singh @ Eklavaya Singh …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opp. Party
With Cr. Revision No. 760 of 2018
….
Eklavya Singh @ Eklavaya Singh …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opp. Party
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate Mrs. J. Mazumdar, Advocate (In all cases) For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo, A. P. P. (Cr. Rev. No. 1142 of 2018) Mr. Achinto Sen, A. P. P. (Cr. M.P. No. 3125 of 2017) Mr. Subodh Kumar Dubey, A. P. P.
(Cr. Rev. No. 760 of 2018)
…. .
05/17.07.2023 Perused the report sent vide Letter No. 829/2023 dated 10.07.2023 sent by Sri Sujit Kumar Singh, learned Additional Sessions Judge-1st , Dhanbad.
2. It appears from the report sent vide Letter No. 829/2023 dated 10.07.2023 sent by Sri Sujit Kumar Singh, learned Additional Sessions Judge-1st , Dhanbad that the case related to S. T. No. 395 of 2017 arising out of Dhansar P. S. Case No. 141 of 2016, the case has already disposed of on 30.11.2022 and all 22 accused persons have been acquitted.
-2-
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
Kamlesh/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitions are to be dismissed as having become infructuous after the acquittal of all accused.
Amarjeet Singh and others
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
