Petitions filed for quashing of an order taking cognizance in a cheating case were permitted to be withdrawn by the Court as no objection was raised by the State or opposite parties.
Petitions for quashment permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of; pending IA disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 2564 of 2013
Binod Kumar Verma ..... … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Smt. Ratna Devi ..... … Opposite Parties with Cr.M.P. No. 811 of 2010
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----For the Petitioners : Mr. N.K. Jaiswal, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl.P.P. : Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P.
Status report is available on record, which suggests that nonbailable warrant has been issued against Pradip Kumar Singh on 30.03.2012 and the matter is fixed for appearance. The discharge petition filed by both the petitioners has been dismissed.
In view of such development, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw these petitions.
As such, these petitions are permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of. Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Amitesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether these petitions for quashment of order in criminal proceedings ought to be permitted to be withdrawn.
Binod Kumar Verma
Pradeep Kumar Singh
State of Jharkhand
Smt. Ratna Devi
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
