Petitioner sought quashing of a revision order but the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the petitioner had already been convicted and preferred a criminal appeal.
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to pending criminal appeal and conviction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 2021 of 2013
Sanjay Paul … Petitioner
-Versus-
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner : Mr. Saurav Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, A.P.P.
08/11.04.2023 This petition has been filed for quashing of the order dated 10.04.2013 passed by the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge, Ghatshila in Cr. Revision No.170 of 2012 in connection with G.R. Case No.427 of 2009 arising out of Ghatshila P.S. Case No.97 of 2009, pending in the court of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghatshila.
Status report is on the record, which suggests that the petitioner has already been convicted and he has also preferred Criminal Appeal and his provisional bail has been confirmed by the appellate court.
In view of the status report, this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Ajay/
Sanjay Paul
The State of Jharkhand
Rupa Paul
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
