The High Court allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition filed to restore a dismissed criminal revision petition. The order emphasized non-compliance with a peremptory order as the reason for the prior dismissal.
Restoration of Cr. Revision No. 203 of 2019 to its original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M.P No. 1933 of 2023
Rana Shailesh Kumar Singh @ Rana Shailesh Singh
…… Petitioner
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Md. Faruque Quraishi ……. Opp. Parties
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, APP ----------- 04/Dated: 18th August, 2023
This criminal misc. petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for restoration of Cr. Revision no.203 of 2019, which stood dismissed due to non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 29.03.2022 passed by this Court.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
In view of the averments made in paragraphs-7, 8, 9 and 10 of the instant application, the instant Cr.M.P No.1933 of 2023 is allowed and Cr. Revision No.203 of 2019 is restored to its original file.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
Saket/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous petition for restoration of a previously dismissed criminal revision petition should be allowed.
Rana Shailesh Kumar Singh @ Rana Shailesh Singh
State of Jharkhand
Md. Faruque Quraishi
Sanjay Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
