Petitioner sought withdrawal of criminal revision after being acquitted by the court below. With state's consent, the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the revision as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the criminal revision, which was then dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Rev. No. 452 of 2019
... Petitioner Binay Kumar @ Binoy Kumar Sahu -VersusThe State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
--------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD --------For the Petitioner : Mr. Awanish Ranjan Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, A.P.P.
Order No. 07/ Dated: 16.08.2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdrawn this Criminal Revision as the petitioner is acquitted from the learned Court below.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection. In view of the submission made above, this Criminal Revision is permitted to be withdrawn .
Thus, this instant Criminal Revision No. 452 of 2019 is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
Bibha/
Binay Kumar @ Binoy Kumar Sahu
State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
