Court quashed the order taking cognizance dated 18.08.2014 under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, finding it defective due to non-application of judicial mind, and remanded the matter for a fresh order.
Order dated 18.08.2014 set aside; matter remitted to learned court to pass a fresh order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 185 of 2016
----
Md. Taj Mian and Others .... Petitioners
-- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioners :- none For the State :- Mrs. Vandana Bharti, Advocate ----
4
petitioners.
aside.
a fresh order in accordance with law.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
SI/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceeding under the Indian Forest Act should be quashed due to non-application of judicial mind in the cognizance order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Md. Taj Mian and Others
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
