Single judge dismissed writ petition for quashing criminal proceedings. Court held materials regarding chargesheet were not on record; FIR challenge alone insufficient for quashing with chargesheet submitted.
Petition dismissed; no relief extended to petitioner as chargesheet was submitted and FIR challenge alone insufficient.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 157 of 2023
Kanika Bansal …… Petitioner Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Others …… Respondents ---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Faisal Allam, Advocate For the Resp. No.5 : Mrs Nirupma, Advocate
06/Dated: 11/08/2023
Mrs. Nirupama submits that she has received vakalatanama on behalf
of respondent no.5 and willing to file the same.
2
stage.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Satyarthi/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for quashing criminal proceedings in Khunti A.H.T.U. P.S. Case No. 05 of 2022 deserves to be allowed at this stage.
Kanika Bansal
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court