Single judge dismissed the petition due to the petitioner's failure to appear and lack of interest, vacating the interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1299 of 2015
Suresh Kumar Singh
.... …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. ..... …Opposite Parties
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner: None For the State :Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Spl. P.P.
05/ Dated:-21.11.2023
On repeated calls, nobody appeared on behalf of the
petitioner. Learned counsel for the State is present.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Pending I.A, if any, stands dismissed. Interim order is vacated.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Satyarthi/-
Suresh Kumar Singh
The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
