Crim.M.P.s dismissed for lack of appearance and apparent lack of interest in the matters pending before the Court.
The petitions were dismissed and interim orders were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1140 of 2011
N. Venkateshwar Rao @ N. V. Venketeshwarna Rao
.... …Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Anr. ..... …Opposite Parties With
Cr.M.P. No. 674 of 2011
N. Venkateshwar Rao @ N. V. Venketeshwarna Rao
.... …Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Anr. ..... …Opposite Parties
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioners :- For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, A.P.P. (in Cr.M.P. No. 1140 of 2011) For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. (in Cr.M.P. No. 674/2011) Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, Advocate (in Cr.M.P. 1140/2011)
08/ Dated:-09.11.2023
Mr. Ashwini Bhushan, learned counsel submits that
inspite of information provided to the petitioners by the conducting counsel, no alternative arrangement has been made by the petitioners for arguing the matter.
matters.
if any stands disposed of. Interim order passed in respective cases stands vacated.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Satyarthi/-
N. Venkateshwar Rao @ N. V. Venketeshwarna Rao
The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
