In contempt proceedings, the High Court acknowledged compliance with its prior order by the respondent. The court dropped the proceedings and reserved the right to the petitioner for further legal steps as permissible.
Contempt proceedings were dropped; the court found no inclination to proceed further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 430 of 2022
Akshay Kumar Mahto, aged about- 59 years, Son of- Sri Upendra Nath Mahto, Resident of- Near I.B., NH-33, Bundu, P.O. & P.S.- Bundu, District - Ranchi (Jharkhand)
... ... ... Petitioner
Versus
… … ... Opposite Parties
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
--------For the Petitioner: Mr. Prem Pujari Roy, Advocate For the Opp. Parties: Mr. Kunal Chandra Suman, A.C. to G.P.-II Mr. Parambir Singh Bajaj, Advocate
--------- 05/Dated: 10.02.2023
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J)
Manoj/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to drop the contempt proceedings after finding compliance with the court order.
Whether to allow the petitioner to preserve rights for further permissible legal steps.
Akshay Kumar Mahto
The State of Jharkhand
Mr. A. Muthukumar
Mr. M.C. Mehta
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
