This matter was disposed of as infructuous because the order of the writ court relied upon in the petition was quashed by the Division Bench in an order dated 13.01.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 314 of 2020
Basudeo Gope ..... … Petitioner
Versus
..... … Opposite Parties
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. L.V.N. Shahdeo, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Rahul Dev, A.C. to S.C. (L&C)-III For the University : Mrs. I. Sen Choudhary, Advocate. ------
06/ 13.01.2023 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as
learned counsel appearing for the State and the University jointly submit that the order of the writ court has been quashed by the Division Bench, in L.P.A. No. 786 of 2019.
In that view of the matter, this matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this matter is disposed of.
Amitesh/-
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Basudeo Gope
The State of Jharkhand
Dr. Mukul Narayan Deo
Dr. Banshi Dhar Rukhiyar
Shri Shailesh Kumar Singh
Dr. Bimal Kumar Mishra
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
