Allowed

Suraj Kumar Turi v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC16 Oct 2023B.A./8965/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for regular bail, the High Court of Jharkhand granted release to the applicant who was in custody. The petitioner furnished bail bond and undertook to appear in trial with specified reporting and identification conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant directed to be released on bail on bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount each, subject to specified reporting and contact conditions till conclusion of trial.

Suraj Kumar Turi Vs the State of Jharkhand — Cheating and Forgery | Jharkhand HC (2023)

¶1

- 1 -

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.8965 of 2023

¶3

Suraj Kumar Turi …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …... Opp. Party

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

¶5

For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratik Sen, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, A.P.P ---------

¶6

02/Dated: 16th October, 2023

¶7

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State

¶8

2. The applicant, who is in custody since 29.11.2022, has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.220 of 2022, registered for the offence under Sections 341/ 342/ 323/ 395/ 386/ 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

3. It appears that the applicant has been made accused for committing loot in the petrol pump.

¶10

4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that complete set of F.I.R along with its enclosures have been annexed with the present bail application and there is no suppression on his part.

¶11

Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that save and except confession, there is no other material against this applicant. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.

¶12

5. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶13

6. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant is directed to be released on bail, on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M, Hazaribagh, in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No.220 of 2022, subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be the father of applicant and this applicant will report once in a month before the concerned police station, till the conclusion of trial and the applicant will also submit selfattested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and his mobile number before the learned court below which he will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.

¶14

(Rajesh Kumar, J.)

¶15

Chandan/-

Suraj Kumar Turi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj Kumar Turi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dindayal Ojha Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ramesh Nath Vs the State of Jharkhand

Salman Khan Alias Abdul Salman Khan Alias Salman Vs the State of Jharkhand

Munna Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Usha Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Durgesh Alias Durgesh Kumar Yadav Alias Durgesh Yadav Alias Sourav Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand