The High Court of Jharkhand permitted the withdrawal of an anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioners, stating that the application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.6739 of 2022
------
1.Sanjeev Kumar Singh @ Sanjeev Singh 2.Rajeev Kumar @ Rajeev Ram .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Subash Chandra Poddar .... .... ....Opposite Parties
------
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-----For the Petitioners : Mr. A. K. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Someshwar Roy, Addl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Suraj Prakash, Advocate.
------
Order No.07 Dated- 16.01.2023
Learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission of this court to withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands dismissed
as withdrawn.
Pappu/APK
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
Sanjeev Kumar Singh @ Sanjeev Singh
Rajeev Kumar @ Rajeev Ram
The State of Jharkhand
Subash Chandra Poddar
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
