The High Court of Jharkhand granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw his anticipatory bail application, dismissing it as withdrawn without engaging in substantive hearing.
Permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5226 of 2022
------
Gaurav Karmkar @ Sunny @ Gourav Karmakar @ Gourav Karmkar
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Jivani Karmkar @ Jwni Kumari .... .... ....Opposite Parties
------
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Kumar Karan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mahto, Addl.P.P For the O. P. No. 2 : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate.
------
Order No. 06 Dated- 18.01.2023
Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands dismissed
as withdrawn.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
R.K./APK
Gaurav Karmkar @ Sunny @ Gourav Karmakar @ Gourav Karmkar
The State of Jharkhand
Jivani Karmkar @ Jwni Kumari
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
