This order holds an anticipatory bail application infructuous and dismisses it because the petitioner was arrested in a different case.
Anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as being infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4943 of 2022
------
Sunil Tirkey .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rekha Khesh .... .... ....Opposite Parties
------
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
-----For the Petitioner : Ms. Shatakshi, Advocate For the State : Ms. Kumari Rashmi, Addl.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Saurabh Pandey, Advocate
------
Order No.11 Dated- 11.07.2023
It has been report by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been arrested in another case. Therefore, this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as being infructuous.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
Umesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application becomes infructuous if the petitioner is arrested in another case.
Sunil Tirkey
The State of Jharkhand
Rekha Khesh
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
