Bail application held infructuous as the case was posted for judgment. Application dismissed without engaging on merits.
Bail application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4580 of 2023
Pormani Kunkal @ Pramanik Kunkal …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ……. Opp. Party --------CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, APP ----------- 2/Dated: 07th July, 2023
Mr. Anjani Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the case has been posted for judgment on 18.07.2023 and as such he is not pressing this bail application at this stage.
In view of the fact that the case has been posted for judgment on 18.07.2023 hence this bail application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this Bail Application No.4580 of 2023 is dismissed being infructuous.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
Saket/-
Pormani Kunkal @ Pramanik Kunkal
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
