Allowed

Subodh Kumar Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC18 Apr 2023B.A./391/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application, the High Court of Jharkhand allowed the applicant to be released on regular bail, directing the furnishing of a bond and ensuring submission of Aadhaar details and active mobile number to the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Directed to release the applicant on bail by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to conditions regarding Aadhaar and mobile number.

Subodh Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.391 of 2023

¶2

¶3

Subodh Kumar Yadav …. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party

¶4

---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

¶5

---For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Sabyasanchi, Adv. For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, A.P.P. ---- 04/Dated: 18^th April, 2023

¶6

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State.

¶7

2. The applicant who is in custody since 26.11.2022 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Sahibganj (M) P.S. Case No.236 of 2019 (S.T. No.32 of 2020), registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 504, 302 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sahibganj.

¶8

3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.

¶9

4. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that there is scuffle between two groups and the allegation is general and omnibus in nature. Further, the other similarly situated co-accused has already been enlarged on bail. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.

¶10

5. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶11

6. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sahibganj in connection with Sahibganj (M) P.S. Case No.236 of 2019 (S.T. No.32 of 2020), subject to condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the learned court below which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.

¶12

(Rajesh Kumar, J.)

¶13

Amar/-

Subodh Kumar Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subodh Kumar Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinay Yadav Alias Vinay Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mohan Marandi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Dhaneshwar Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pankaj Kumar Yadav Alias Pankej Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ashutosh Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rahul Kumar Alias Rahul Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand