Petitioner argued that the underlying title suit was disposed of, rendering this CMP infructuous. The court dismissed the petition based on these admitted facts.
The civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
(Civil Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) C.M.P. No.345 of 2022
------
Gurubachen Kaur and Ors.
.... …. Petitioners/Plaintiffs
Versus
Bihari Gope
.... .... .... Respondent/Defendant
------
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
For the Petitioner : Mr. Piyush Chitresh, Advocate Mr. Sushant Kumar, Adv. : For the Respondent
------
Order No.06 Dated- 01.12.2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the original Title Suit i.e. Title Suit No.124 of 2001 in which the impugned order was passed, has already been disposed off, therefore, this civil miscellaneous petition has become infructuous.
Considering the above facts, this civil miscellaneous petition stands dismissed.
(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)
Pappu/
Gurubachen Kaur and Ors.
Bihari Gope
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
