The High Court of Jharkhand granted regular bail to the petitioner accused under the Arms Act upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties, subject to specific conditions.
Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties subject to conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 2952 of 2023
Rajeev Kumar @ Chhotu @ Bhuwra @ Rajeev Kumar Singh . .... .. ... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand. .. ... ...Opp. Party(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
......... For the Petitioner : Mr. Baibhaw Gahlaut, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, APP
03/ 13.06.2023 . Petitioner above-named who is in custody since 22.01.2023 has moved this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Sector-4 (Bokaro) P.S. Case No.18 of 2023 registered under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.
Heard the parties.
As per the case of the prosecution, one used cartridge and one live cartridge are alleged to have been seized from the conscious possession of the petitioner.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that after investigation, charge-sheet has also been submitted.
It is further submitted that there is no independent witness to the seizure of memo and the petitioner works as a labourer.
Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer.
Considering the submissions of learned counsel and the fact as discussed above, the bail application is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner named above shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below subject to the condition that one of the bailor(s) must be close relatives of the petitioner and that he shall not commit an offence, similar to the offence of which he is accused in the present case.
Sandeep/Uploaded.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajeev Kumar @ Chhotu @ Bhuwra @ Rajeev Kumar Singh
The State of Jharkhand
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
