Court held anticipatory bail application infructuous due to issuance of summons. Directed petitioners to surrender within two weeks to address regular bail application per Supreme Court guidelines.
Directed petitioners to surrender before lower court within two weeks for disposal of bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A No. 192 of 2023
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
For the Petitioners: Mr. Niranjan Singh, Advocate For the O.P-State: Mr. Tarun Kumar, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. Rahul Dev, Advocate
09 / 22.06.2023 Mr. Rahul Dev, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2, submitted that the process has been issued in this case for securing attendance of the petitioners. Therefore, this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
(Ambuj Nath, J)
Ranjeet/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application having become infructuous warrants surrender and disposal of bail application.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil versues Central Bureau of Investigation and AnotherReferred¶11
(2022) 10 SCC 51 · Who else cites this
Birendra Jha @ Virendra Jha Versus State of JharkhandReferred¶11
[2001 (2) JLJR 76]
Roseline Mary @ Rojlin Marry
Kumar Keshab @ Kumar Keshav
The State of Jharkhand
Ramesh Chandra Ruj
Ambuj Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
