The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner for offences under Sections 323, 324, 498-A IPC, 504/34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act. The court directed surrender and release on bail bonds.
Anticipatory bail granted; directed to surrender and be released on bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A No. 1596 of 2023
Mahesh Manjhi ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Kanchan Devi ----Opp. Parties ---
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
For the Petitioner: Mr. Manoj Kr. No. 4, Advocate For the O.P-State: Mr. Tapas Roy, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. Suraj Singh, Advocate
07 / 14.06.2023 Heard the parties.
(Ambuj Nath, J)
Ranjeet/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in offences under Section 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.
Whether the allegations of dowry demand and torture are well-founded considering the case diary entries.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahesh Manjhi
The State of Jharkhand
Kanchan Devi
Ambuj Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
