Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that S.A. No. 154 of 2020 was dismissed for default of the petitioner-appellant. It is next submitted that on 18.01.2023 when the appeal was called out, the learned counsel for the petitioner-appellant was engaged in another Court for argument, whereas the other counsel namely Savita Kumari was assisting him and the counsel Mr. Sandip Kumar Burnwal was also in another court and the counsels Mr. Birat Kumar and Mr. Anil Kumar Singh have not come to court on that day due to some personal difficulty, hence the learned counsel for petitioner-appellant could not appear before this Court and the appeal was dismissed for default of the petitioner-appellant. It is further submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in this S.A. No. 154 of 2020 and unless S.A. No. 154 of 2020 is restored to its original file, the petitioner-appellant will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the S.A. No. 154 of 2020 be restored to its original file.