The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition after it was withdrawn by the petitioner with a liberty to assail the penalty portion of the impugned order before the concerned authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
[Civil Writ Jurisdiction] W.P.(C ) No. 808 of 2020
Sushant Manna
.... .. ... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Jharkhand & Ors.
.. ... ...Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO
For the Petitioners : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the respondent(s)/State : Mr. Deepankar, AC to AG
06/ 06.07.2022 . Heard, learned counsel for the parties.
Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha, learned counsel has submitted, that he has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioner yesterday and he has received instruction to withdraw the instant Writ Petition with a liberty to assail the penalty portion of the impugned order before the concerned authority.
Mr. Deepankar, learned AC to AG for the State has no objection.
Considering the same, the instant Writ Petition stands dismissed, as withdrawn reserving the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner.
( Kailash Prasad Deo, J. )
Sandeep/
Sushant Manna
State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Kailash Prasad Deo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
