Writ petition seeking direction to modify superannuation age benefits and reinstate petitioners was dismissed as infructuous since petitioners had already reached the age of superannuation.
Claim for modification of notification and reinstatement dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No. 5692 of 2010
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioners : Mr. Anurag Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Advocate
Through Video Conferencing
13/03.02.2022
2
that present writ petition has become infructuous as the petitioner has already attained the age of superannuation. This submission of the respondents-state is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Binit/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking modification of superannuation age and reinstatement remains maintainable when petitioners have already attained the age of superannuation.
Nalini Ranjan Sinha
Lal Bahadur Singh
State of Jharkhand
Secretary, Health Medical Education and family welfare, Government of Jharkhand
Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reform and Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
