Petitioner filed a writ petition for issuance of writ directing Respondents to confirm Assured Career Progression and grant pension. Learned counsel submitted the matter is infructuous and the writ petition is not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 4080 of 2010
Ram Pratap Mahto, S/o Late Baldeo Mahto, R/o- S.P.G. Mission Compound, P.O.- Chaibasa, P.S. Sadar, District- Singhbhum West, Jharkhand … … Petitioner
Versus
… … Respondents
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
--For the Petitioner : Mr. R. P. Gupta, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Kunal Chandra Suman, Advocate
Through Video Conferencing
04 /16.02.2022 This petition has been filed for the following reliefs:
“For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) or writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding upon the concerned Respondents to confirm Assured Carrier Progression as the petitioner is not getting pension who was a peon in the Forest Department who retired w.e.f. 30.09.2006.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. R. P. Gupta submits that the matter has become infructuous and accordingly, he does not want to press this writ petition.
3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
4. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is closed.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Pankaj
Ram Pratap Mahto
State of Jharkhand
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
