Coram allowed an application seeking withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed the main petition as withdrawn with no objection from the respondent.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed and the petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
[Civil Writ Jurisdiction]
W.P.(C ) No. 3865 of 2003
Md. Nasim .... .. ... Petitioner(s) Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .. ... ...Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jay Shankar Tripathy, Advocate For the respondent(s)/State : Mr. Sandeep Verma, AC to Sr.S.C.-III
11/ 07.07.2022 . I.A. No.5343 of 2022.
Mr. Jay Shankar Tripathy, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the aforesaid I.A. has been filed for withdrawal of the instant Writ Petition. Mr. Sandeep Verma, learned AC to Sr.S.C.-III for the State has no objection. Accordingly, the prayer made in the aforesaid I.A. stands allowed. The aforesaid I.A. stands allowed. Consequently, the instant Writ Petition stands dismissed, as withdrawn.
( Kailash Prasad Deo, J. )
Sandeep/
Md. Nasim
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
KAILASH PRASAD DEO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
