Petitioner sought modification of a bail order disputing the total sum required. Court observed petitioner affirmatively admitted the higher amount in a subsequent filing, concluding the petition was filed with mala fide intention and dismissed it.
Petition seeking modification of bail order amount was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 98 of 2019
Rajiv Kumar @ Rajeev Kumar …. Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Sudama Kumar
…. Opp. Party(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN . (Through: Video Conferencing)
For the Petitioner(s): Ms. Nitesh Kumar, Advocate For the State: A.P.P. For the Informant: Mr. Vijay Kr. Sharma, Advocate.
08/11.03.2022: This petition has been filed praying therein for modification of part of the order dated 28.11.2018 passed in B.A. No. 6969 of 2018.
-2-
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
Anu/-C.P.3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a petition seeking correction of a bail order amount based on a discrepancy was filed with bona fide intention or mala fide.
Whether the discrepancy in payment amounts alleged was acknowledged by the petitioner in a subsequent petition.
Rajiv Kumar @ Rajeev Kumar
State of Jharkhand
Sudama Kumar
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
