Petitioner sought withdrawal of the criminal miscellaneous petition when State had no objection. Court permitted withdrawal with liberty to raise grounds later and dismissed the petition.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to take grounds at the appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 89 of 2022
Md. Mansur Ansari ..... … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Jahan Aara ..... … Opposite Parties --------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Advocate. For the State : Mr. S.K. Tiwari, Spl.P.P. ------
03/ 21.04.2022 Mr. S.K. Tiwari, learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State submits that the cognizance has already been taken, however, in this petition only FIR is under challenge. He submits that what materials have come against the petitioner, is not available on the record.
In view of such submission, Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with the liberty to take all the grounds at the appropriate stage.
Mr. S.K. Tiwari, learned Spl.P.P., appearing for the State has
got no objection.
Permission is accorded.
This criminal miscellaneous petition, is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Amitesh/-
Md. Mansur Ansari
The State of Jharkhand
Jahan Aara
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
