Arjun Ghosh Alias Shyama Pada Ghosh v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition dismissed as infructuous since the case was already disposed of in the court below.
Petition dismissed as infructuous since the case was already disposed of in the court below.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 751 of 2018
… Petitioners
-Versus-
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioners : Mr. Gopal K. Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party-State : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, A.P.P.
07/20.04.2022. Heard Mr. Gopal K. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the State.
This petition has been taken through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been heard.
Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the State submits that the
case has already been disposed of in the court below.
In view of such submission, this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Ajay/
Arjun Ghosh and others
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court