Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the present criminal miscellaneous petition. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn upon hearing counsel for both sides.
Permission to withdraw the petition allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 536 of 2015
Vijeesh K.V. @ Vijesh K.B. .... …Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
..... …Opp. Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner : Mr. P.S. Dayal, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P.
07/ Dated:-20.04.2022
This petition has been taken up through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising due to COVID-19 pandemic.
Mr. P.S. Dayal, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
Mrs. Ruby Pandey, learned counsel for the State has got no objection.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending I.A, if any, stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Satyarthi/-
Vijeesh K.V. @ Vijesh K.B.
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
