Sultan Miya v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P.…
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M. P. No. 1386 of 2022
Sultan Miya … …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … …. Opp. Party -----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
----For the Petitioner : Mr. Sarvendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, A.P.P. -----
Oral Order
04 / Dated : 02.12.2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed this criminal misc. petition praying therein to modify part of the order dated 12.01.2022 passed in B.A. No. 14898 of 2021 by which this Court has rejected the bail application of the petitioner with a direction to the trial court to conclude the trial, preferably within a period of nine months of framing of charge.
By order dated 22.06.2022, status report was called for from the trial court
which has been received to this Court vide Letter No. 313 dated 29.06.2022.
After going through the status report, I do not find any merit in the criminal misc. petition which is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J . )
AKT
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to modify a previous bail rejection order including a direction to complete trial within nine months.
Sultan Miya
The State of Jharkhand
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court